Human-guided intelligent institutions have their own goals, means, mindsets, and decision making protocols. Few are designed for our general benefit.

“Personality traits, such as severe narcissism or antisocial behavior, impacts a leader’s decision-making capacity and, by extension, democratic stability.”
— James and Ashley Weinberg, paraphrased (2026)

The threat of A.I. is portrayed as an independent agent working toward non-human goals. The danger, we’re told, is that such an agent will pursue its goals at the cost of morality and human values. Such agents have been with us since the dawn of civilization in the form of independent institutions. They are now enshrined as individuals in the form of corporations and authoritarian governments.

From this point of view, exploitation is predictable. Institutions further their own expansion over the benefits of the individuals with whom they’re engaged. Corporations enhance their profits at the expense of consumers, and governments expand their power at the cost of lives and health…

Would You Know Artificial Intelligence If You Saw It?

Machines Can Behave Unpredictably

Institutions Are Forms of Artificial Intelligence

Feedback

The Future of A.I. is Already Written

The Cost/Benefit Equation is Incomplete

What’s the Difference Between Institutions and A.I.?

Back to Mental Health


This post is delivered to and accessible by paid subscribers to the Stream of the Subconscious blog which publishes 4x/month and offers podcasts, discounts, video meetings, and other perks.

If you’re a subscriber, this button will take you to the post. If you’re not, it will take you to the subscription page.